Loading episodes…
0:00 0:00

Inside the Zero-Day Market: The Hidden Economy of Cyber Weapons

00:00
BACK TO HOME

Inside the Zero-Day Market: The Hidden Economy of Cyber Weapons

10xTeam February 27, 2026 12 min read

We all know the Hollywood image of a hacker. A figure in a dark room, wearing a black hoodie. Staring at multiple screens filled with green code scrolling at impossible speeds. Then, a sudden smile. “I’m in.”

But the reality of a cyberattack is far from this dramatic scene. It doesn’t need the drama. All it needs is one tiny secret. A simple vulnerability or a mistake no one else has noticed.

To find that secret, you have to enter a world where the most dangerous and brilliant hackers converge. A place where governments, corporations, and even organized crime syndicates compete. They’re all racing to buy a small piece of information. Information that could start a war, or preserve peace.

This is the zero-day market.

The Anatomy of a Flaw

Modern operating systems like Windows or macOS contain millions of lines of code. Imagine each line of code is a brick in a massive wall. We’re talking about a colossal structure, like the Great Wall of China.

Among all those bricks, the probability of one being defective or misplaced is high. In the world of programming, this flawed brick is a vulnerability.

Major companies like Microsoft and Apple spend millions to find and fix these vulnerabilities before anyone else does. They run bug bounty programs, paying hackers who discover and report a flaw.

But another class of hackers exists. Their goal is to exploit these vulnerabilities for personal gain. Or to sell them to the highest bidder.

And this is where the real story begins.

The Concept of “Zero-Day”

When a company discovers a security flaw in its software, it immediately releases an update or a patch to fix the problem. But imagine a vulnerability exists that the manufacturer knows nothing about. The company has had zero days of knowledge about this flaw.

This is a zero-day vulnerability. A flaw known only to its discoverer. This single vulnerability could be enough to compromise an entire system.

That’s why finding zero-day exploits is no easy task. A hacker might spend years studying code, searching for just one mistake. This makes these vulnerabilities rare and extremely valuable. And from this value, the idea of the zero-day market was born.

The Market’s Humble Beginnings

In the 1990s, as the internet and personal computers began to spread, the landscape was entirely different. Back then, when a hacker found a vulnerability, they would often contact the company to report it.

But instead of thanking them, companies treated them like criminals. They were often threatened with legal action. The result? Hackers stopped helping. Instead, they started publishing the vulnerabilities they found.

Platforms like BackTrack emerged. You can think of them as early versions of internet forums. Hackers would post their findings there. It was a way to punish companies while gaining fame and respect within the community. There was no money involved.

But year after year, other parties began to understand the value of these vulnerabilities. People started contacting these skilled hackers—the ones working for free, just for reputation. They offered them large sums of money. Slowly, a whole network of relationships began to form.

The market kept growing until 2003. A cybersecurity company called iDefense stepped in. They told the hackers: instead of publishing vulnerabilities for free or facing legal threats, why not sell them to us? We’ll handle the rest.

The prices were modest at first. Maybe $75 for a simple vulnerability. If it was particularly rare or dangerous, the price could reach $1,000 or more. iDefense would then take the vulnerability and report it to the manufacturer. The model worked well, for a while.

Until the market caught the attention of the big players.

The Rise of the Brokers

As money flooded the market, a new layer of companies appeared: the brokers. Their sole business was buying and selling security vulnerabilities. Among the most famous were the French company VUPEN and Zerodium.

Brokers offered hackers a secure channel to sell their discoveries anonymously. At the same time, they provided buyers with a trusted source, so they didn’t have to deal with hackers directly.

Like any market, the price of a vulnerability depended on its rarity, power, and the target it could reach. For a long time, the iPhone was the most expensive target because it was the hardest device to hack. But at one point, the price for Android vulnerabilities surpassed the iPhone’s.

Zerodium was one of the few companies that publicly published its price list. This list gives us a glimpse into the staggering amounts of money moving through this market.

  • A zero-day exploit that bypasses a phone’s passcode could fetch up to $100,000.
  • If the vulnerability allowed access to chat apps like WhatsApp or the browser, the price jumped to $500,000.
  • The most dangerous exploits—those that allowed a complete takeover of the phone without the user even knowing or doing anything wrong—had prices reaching $2 million to $2.5 million.

Governments Enter the Game

Once the idea of buying security vulnerabilities became a reality, governments got involved. Intelligence agencies and their intermediaries began contacting hackers. They offered prices higher than anyone else. But their main condition was absolute secrecy.

A question naturally arises: why would governments pay millions of dollars for a software flaw? The answer is simple. These vulnerabilities provide them with intelligence capabilities they could only dream of in the past.

Previously, if an agency wanted to spy on someone, they needed to plant a listening device in their home or office. Now, with a powerful zero-day exploit, they can penetrate their phone. They can see and hear everything in their life.

But it doesn’t stop there. These vulnerabilities can be used to destroy infrastructure.

  • Shut down power grids.
  • Paralyze a banking system.
  • Strike a military facility.

This has made owning an arsenal of zero-day exploits a fundamental part of any nation’s modern national security. The situation is almost identical to the nuclear arms race during the Cold War.

If you still underestimate the gravity of this, let me tell you about the most famous incidents involving zero-days.

Case Study 1: Stuxnet (2010)

In 2010, an attack targeted Iran’s nuclear program, specifically the Natanz uranium enrichment facility. The facility was hit by a computer virus called Stuxnet. Experts consider it the world’s first true cyber weapon.

Stuxnet was designed to do one thing and one thing only: Destroy the centrifuges used for uranium enrichment.

The attack began with an infected USB flash drive. It was plugged into a computer inside the facility, which Iran had completely isolated from the internet. Once Stuxnet was inside the system, it exploited four critical zero-day vulnerabilities in Windows to spread throughout the internal network.

The virus searched for industrial control systems. When it found them, it began its destructive mission. It forced the centrifuges to spin incredibly fast, then stop suddenly. It repeated this cycle over and over until the machines physically broke apart.

Meanwhile, it sent fake reports to the monitoring screens of the Iranian scientists. The reports said everything was normal. By the time the attack was discovered, Stuxnet had destroyed a fifth of the centrifuges at Natanz. It set back Iran’s nuclear program by years.

Although no one officially claimed responsibility, all evidence pointed to a joint operation between the United States and Israel.

Case Study 2: WannaCry (2017)

On May 12, 2017, a ransomware virus called WannaCry spread with terrifying speed across the globe. Hundreds of thousands of screens worldwide suddenly turned red. A message appeared: “Your files have been encrypted. Pay the ransom to get them back.”

The message included a countdown timer. If time ran out, the ransom price would increase. If you didn’t pay within a week, your files would be deleted forever.

  • In the UK, hospitals were forced to cancel surgeries.
  • Airlines in India, universities in China, the Japanese police were all hit.
  • Spain’s largest telecom company and even the Russian Interior Ministry were affected.

More than 150 countries were infected in a matter of hours. The horror was that the vulnerability the virus used was part of the cyber weapons arsenal of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). The exploit, named EternalBlue, had been stolen from the agency by an anonymous hacker group called the Shadow Brokers. They leaked it on the internet months before the attack.

The very tool America had created for espionage was now being used to blackmail the world. The attack could have been much worse. By sheer chance, a British researcher named Marcus Hutchins noticed the virus was trying to contact a strange domain name. He tried to visit the site and found it wasn’t registered. He paid $10 to register the domain himself.

By pure coincidence, this turned out to be the virus’s kill switch. As soon as the virus found the domain was active, it automatically stopped spreading. Marcus Hutchins saved the world’s computers for just $10.

Case Study 3: NotPetya (2017)

The world was still reeling from the shock of WannaCry. Just one month later, on June 27, 2017, a second, more violent attack occurred. Experts consider it the most destructive cyberattack in history: NotPetya.

The attack was primarily aimed at Ukraine, but it spiraled out of control and spread worldwide. Hackers, attributed to Russian intelligence, compromised a popular accounting software in Ukraine. Through it, they deployed the virus to all companies and institutions using the software. The virus also used the same EternalBlue exploit leaked from the NSA.

Ukrainians woke up to find their country completely paralyzed.

  • Computer screens everywhere were black.
  • Supermarket cash registers didn’t work.
  • ATMs were down.
  • Banks were offline.
  • Companies couldn’t pay salaries.
  • Even the radiation monitoring systems at the Chernobyl reactor were not working.

The attack didn’t stop at Ukraine’s borders. It spread to giant multinational corporations with operations there, all of whom lost hundreds of millions of dollars. Estimates suggest the virus cost the global economy more than $10 billion.

NotPetya was a turning point. It showed the world that cyber warfare could inflict massive physical and economic destruction, not just a computer infection. And it proved that cyber wars have no geographical boundaries. When a fire starts, it burns everyone.

Case Study 4: Operation Triangulation (2023)

After years of the zero-day market’s evolution, we arrived at one of the most sophisticated attacks ever discovered. In June 2023, the Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky announced it had uncovered an espionage campaign targeting the company itself.

While monitoring their office Wi-Fi networks, researchers noticed strange activity coming from the iPhones of employees and senior managers. As they investigated, they discovered the devices were infected with spyware far more advanced than anything they had ever seen.

The attack had been running for four years without their knowledge. It targeted the phones of senior staff and security researchers within Kaspersky. The terrifying part? The attack required zero interaction from the victim.

A simple iMessage would arrive on the phone with a malicious attachment. The user didn’t even need to click on the file. The moment the message was delivered, the code executed on its own, taking over the device. It used a chain of four zero-day vulnerabilities to gain full control. One of them was a flaw in Apple’s own hardware, something even Apple’s engineers didn’t know about.

In seconds, the iPhone would transmit everything its owner did to the attacker.

  • It recorded calls.
  • It activated the microphone for up to three hours continuously.
  • It sent photos.
  • It tracked the user’s location.
  • It sent passwords saved on the device.

The investigation lasted more than six months and involved a team of Kaspersky’s top experts. After Kaspersky’s announcement, the discovery quickly escalated into a political crisis. The question on everyone’s mind was: who has the capability and resources to execute an attack of this complexity?

Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) released a statement. They accused U.S. intelligence and Apple. They claimed the attack not only targeted Kaspersky employees but also thousands of phones belonging to Russian diplomats and officials in other countries like China and even NATO allies. They explicitly accused Apple of colluding with U.S. intelligence, leaving backdoors to allow American access.

Of course, Apple quickly denied the accusations. But the denial wasn’t very convincing to some.

The Unwritten Future

The stories we’ve told are just a glimpse into the future of international conflict. The zero-day market, growing every day, is proof that every country in the world is preparing for this new kind of war.

As long as humans write code, there will be mistakes. And as long as there are mistakes, there will be people willing to pay millions to exploit them.

We now live in a world where everything is connected to the internet. Your phone, your car, even the power station and the hospital. Every new device we connect is a new door an attacker can walk through.

The question we must ask ourselves is this: What happens when the next attack isn’t for espionage or money? What happens when its goal is total destruction? What happens when someone uses a zero-day to take down an entire nation’s power grid?

The story is not over. Every day, a new chapter is written. With new code, and a new vulnerability. Be careful, and protect your data.


Join the 10xdev Community

Subscribe and get 8+ free PDFs that contain detailed roadmaps with recommended learning periods for each programming language or field, along with links to free resources such as books, YouTube tutorials, and courses with certificates.

Audio Interrupted

We lost the audio stream. Retry with shorter sentences?